|
How to Cut Costs and Improve Quality
Several persons asked about the following quote in the previous quarterly report:
Increasingly, cost and quality are viewed as residuals or outcomes of competing on the basis of time and flexibility.
Answering two questions will prove this statement.
“Is it possible to cut costs without reducing cycle time?”
If you restrict "costs" to "accounting costs," short-term cost reductions are possible without reducing cycle time. For example, if a company downsizes without changing the work being performed, the same amount of work remains for a smaller, less costly workforce. “Economic costs” of disgruntled employees and increased turnover can then lead to "accounting costs" of more returns from dissatisifed customers and increased hiring costs. Thus, costs are not really reduced by downsizing, unless improvements in the efficiency, effectiveness, or economy of the affected actitivies are made.
The only ways to achieve these improvements are to restructure activities or reduce their frequency. “Activities” typically do not include — but should — two “inactivities,” transportation and waiting. Most of the total process cycle time consists of moving documents or products from place to place, or of waiting for another activity to be finished. Transportation or waiting costs include the capital tied up in the affected physical or human resources. Thus, I have not found a situation where costs were truly reduced without also reducing cycle time.
“Is it possible to improve quality without reducing cycle time?”
In Quality is Free, Philip Crosby defines quality as “conformance to expectations.” Internal or external customers set expectations. To improve quality, you must improve communication, collaboration, and coordination. Weaknesses in one or more of these factors results in rework, a quality failure that lengthens expected cycle time. Conversely, improving these factors will simultaneously reduce cycle time and improve quality. Thus, I have not found a situation where quality was improved without also reducing cycle time.
Answering these two questions has shown that to do a task better and cheaper, it suffices to perform it more quickly. Workflow automation is a technology that ensures people work well together by defining expected tasks and performance times, and monitoring actual performance against expectations. All of our workflow automation clients have reported significant cycle time reductions — for example, slashing new product development time by over 50%, reducing the capital expenditure request cycle by 30%, and cutting time out of typical human resources requests.
Fast cycle time — as quantified and tracked through workflow automation — contributes to better performance across the board. If you have not yet implemented workflow automation, then you are missing out on quality improvements and cost reductions.

Todd L. Herman
|